OK, thank you for the precisions. ++ Jack
Le 25 août 08 à 19:32, cyrille henry a écrit : > > > Jack a écrit : >> We are talking about [gemlist]. >> Is there a difference with [any] ? > "gemlist" is a gem object, that work only with gem data > > "any" is an (iem) external that work with any data. > > you can replace "gemlist" with "any" in your patch, but gemlist > should work without any dependency (except Gem of course) > > > cyrille > >> Thanx. >> ++ >> Jack >> Le 25 août 08 à 18:51, Frank Barknecht a écrit : >>> Hallo, >>> Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote: >>> >>>> Hallo, >>>> cyrille henry hat gesagt: // cyrille henry wrote: >>>> >>>>> the best would be not to use the double gemhead trick, but the >>>>> "repeat" (or >>>>> until) trick instead : it's faster, and don't have this >>>>> problem, so i think >>>>> it's easier to understand. >>>> Yes: Everyone is on the latest Gem should use gemlist instead >>>> of the old >>>> double gemhead approach. >>> oh, and of course if people have been usign some abstraction like >>> the >>> dgemhead, it's easy to update it to use [gemlist], if that's >>> available. >>> >>> Ciao >>> -- >>> Frank >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list >>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ >>> listinfo/pd-list >> _______________________________________________ >> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ >> listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
