PSPunch wrote: > I thought the dgemhead and repeat methods were just a matter of > preference. If one is trendy and the other out dated, I guess I can just > drop the one said to be less efficient.
as far as I understand it, there are now 3 methods: 1: double [gemhead] 2: [repeat] 3: [until] with [gemlist] 1 requires only Gem, but is least efficient 2 requires Gem and zexy, but is most efficient 3 requires only Gem, but Gem newer than a certain version 3 is very close to 2 in efficiency They may also have different behaviour, I think (1) implies a built-in [separator] which may or may not be what you want? Please correct this if I'm wrong! Claude _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list