>The original Cosina as well as Vivitar and Phoenix are also
>multicoated.  But that brings up a question.  How much of difference
>is there between Pentax SMC and multicoating on other modern lenses?
>The original SMC patent must have expired by now and anyone is free
>to use it.  And anyway many manufacturers like Nikon and Zeiss
>licensed it back in the 70's.  Pentax claims that SMC reduces loss
>of light transmission to 0.2%-0.3% compared to 5% for non-coated and
>2% for single-coated lenses .  How does multicoating on non-Pentax
>lenses perform?
>
>Of course this is more critical on complex zoom lenses than would be
>on this 5 element lens.

I can tell you that Nikon's coating isn't as good as Pentax SMC, yet. I had 
some Nikkor AF just few years back and they had flare problem which my 
Pentax 20 yrs old SMC lenses do not. Even their high end 80-200/2.8 had 
quite a lot of flare when pointing to the light source.

regards,
Alan Chan
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.

Reply via email to