> After my mother passed away recently my sister took a studio based wedding
> portrait of my father and mother, taken in 1941, to have copies made for the
> family.  Kinkos refused to copy it because they claimed the copyright remains
> with the photographer/studio, not the subjects of the picture.  After all
> these years the studio is probably no longer in business.  Yes, we found a
> way around it...can you say scanner?
> 
> Jerry in Houston

Hi Jerry,
Kinko's is technically correct. In that case they were probably guilty of
observing the letter of the law a bit too closely however...

--Mike

Reply via email to