"tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There's a huge difference between 35mm and >645, but there's *not* a huge difference between 645 and 67.
I'm with Tom and Pål. The difference between 645 and 67 isn't enough to justify the extra bulk and weight when I'm hiking and/or climbing mountains. If I worked in a studio or just in places that were more easily accessible, the 67 would have been my choice. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
