----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 10:35 AM Subject: Re: Medium Format-Which one is best?
> > > tom wrote: > > > > You've got it backwards. There's a huge difference between 35mm and > > 645, but there's *not* a huge difference between 645 and 67. > > > > The difference between 645 and 35mm wasn't enough for me. However, the > difference between 35mm and 6x7 was enough to make me want to make the > move. It's just personal preference, not a matter of millimeters. > Same here. The 6x9 Fuji rangefinders suit me just fine. I love the detail and tonal gradation of the larger neg. I do own a GS645 folder, which can make excellent enlargements, but when you compare the trannies of both formats, they are a world apart. To top it off, I just bought a Microtek 5900. This scanner has a light source for negs and trannies up to 4"x5". At 1200 dpi the 6x9's scan just beautifully. Far superior to my HP S-20 with 35mm. Jeff.
