Quickly, to bring you up to speed: the problem is that photos overhang text. The text does not wrap around photos. I have no idea whose problem that is, but it's really annoying. I haven't changed my Netscape Communicator 4.79 software in any way. Photos used to display properly, but more and more the sites are not displaying properly with NetCOMM. That's not NetCOMM's fault...it's the web site designer's fault. Who else could it be?
keith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/30/03 > at 12:36 AM, "Otis Wright, Jr." <"rusty."@worldnet.att.net> said: > > |>Ditto. Communicator 4.79 and it is beginning to have trouble with a > |>lot of sites where Explorer works OK. I'm putting in a new system > |>next week and will move on to 6.x and if it has problems Netscrape > |>is done at this office. > > |>Otis Wright > > |>Keith Whaley wrote: > > |>> Me, too. Netscape Communicator 4.79. > |>> Sad. I'd like to know what lies behind the photo! > |>> > > I had not been paying attention to this thread so I am not exactly > sure if this is about what I think it is about. If you are talking > about the display of text when mousing over an image then the problem > is that exploader handles alt tags wrongly rather than netscape not > working. this is also the case in how ms handles missing and other > incorect tags. > > the proper code for having text come up on mouse over is title not > alt. alt is what should be displayed or read if a text only browser > is used or a browser for the blind is reading the page. alt=Yellow > flower link to floral pictures and commentary. and title=some yellow > flower i found on the beach do you kno what it is? would be not > unreasonable uses of the two tags > > of course MS does not even adhere to the standards it sets itself > > Bran > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------- > It feels great to wake up and not know what day it is, doesn't it? > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----------------------------------------------------------
