>From Robert & Leigh >Then, I waited for the next body.......the MZ-S. Damn! What an overpriced, >overall disappointment. I know it has several great features but not >freakin' $750-900 worth. Sorry, it just doesn't add up for me. I keep >reding this list hoping that Pentax will come out with a body like the PZ1p >only with 2003 features similar in capability or superior to the Nikon N90 >and F100(veritable bargains as far as I'm concerned). You see, I've been on >nature photography safaris, etc. and have had the opportunity to look >through some wonderful viewfinders and fast glass on F100s and EOS1vs(?) >while I am continually disappointed with the viewfinder on my PZ1p. I also >remain unimpressed with with the viewfinder of the MZ-S. >
Hallo Robert, I think the price for the MZ-S is not to high, if you compare it to the F100. It has also a metal body and something, that the F100 not has. It has data inprinting, leaving the film end out, an internal flash and MLU and it if far smaller. Last year I was on a safari with a friend who had a F100. I was glad that I bought a MZ-S, because of the above features. The fill-in flash was good to use. Not to say, that the F100 is a bad camera, but I liked my Pentax more. regards Rüdiger
