Użytkownik fastpat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: >Robert, if you think the MZ-S is overpriced, compare it to similarly-priced >cameras in terms of build quality, as well as features. It\'s built to a >noticeably higher standard than any other 35mm in the present Pentax line. >I have to agree with another list member (I\'ve forgotten his name) who found >no desire at all to use his MZ-5n, now that he has an MZ-S. The difference >in feel and quality is that obvious.
Yes, but even if the MZ-S is well built, is't not built well ENOUGH to justify the high price - it isn't sealed. So if one doesn't use the camera as a hammer, can easily go for a regular plastic body - it'll surely survive to the next moment of getting a new one. >As for features, it has all most people need. More features does not always >mean more <useful> features. When shooting beside someone with a D100, see >how they envy the better low-light AF of the MZ-S, just for starters. But more features for the same or less money is more fair than less features for more money, don't you think? MZ-S is a great camera but could have been a better one if it was cheaper or have some more features (vide: Dynax 7) Regards Artur
