Do you really do a lot of macro wide open though? I find I have to stop down quite a lot to get any kind of depth of field anyway, so this would not be a killer. Not nice though!
You could always get the Sigma 105 which is nice, or someone else (tamron?) makes a good 90 I think. I always thought the Pentax was supposed to be superior to these except for the huge weight though... > -----Original Message----- > From: Dag T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 October 2003 18:25 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: I got my *ist D and I LOVE IT !!! > > > Then, I´ve got a problem. This is the one lens I´ve been considering > to buy together with an *istD (and a 16-45), as my Vivitar 2x macro > converter is the only K-mount I use regularly. > > Have anybody tested any other macros? > > DagT > > På tirsdag, 14. oktober 2003, kl. 19:05, Jostein: > > > The biggest disappointment there, imo, is the FA100/2.8 > macro. At full > > opening it shows enough chromatic aberration to be > unusable. It's OK > > at f/8, though. > > >
