I have heard some nice things about both the Sigma and the Tamron. I even had an offer to buy the Tamron 90mm, but wanted a Pentax instead :-(
DagT
På tirsdag, 14. oktober 2003, kl. 19:25, skrev Rob Brigham:
Do you really do a lot of macro wide open though?
I find I have to stop down quite a lot to get any kind of depth of field
anyway, so this would not be a killer. Not nice though!
You could always get the Sigma 105 which is nice, or someone else (tamron?) makes a good 90 I think. I always thought the Pentax was supposed to be superior to these except for the huge weight though...
-----Original Message----- From: Dag T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 October 2003 18:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: I got my *ist D and I LOVE IT !!!
Then, I´ve got a problem. This is the one lens I´ve been considering to buy together with an *istD (and a 16-45), as my Vivitar 2x macro converter is the only K-mount I use regularly.
Have anybody tested any other macros?
DagT
På tirsdag, 14. oktober 2003, kl. 19:05, Jostein:
The biggest disappointment there, imo, is the FA100/2.8macro. At fullopening it shows enough chromatic aberration to beunusable. It's OKat f/8, though.