Nothing new there, IMHO Pentax has always gone for the best picture quality rather than the best technical (numbers)quality.

--

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My friend with the 300D and I have compared paper prints from both cameras.

While the picture qualities are different, there is really nothing to say that one is better than the other. It looks like Pentax may be trying to emulate the look of film with the ist D. Both Brian and I have noted that the ist D prints have a smoother tonality to them than the Canon prints. Less of the digital "look" for lack of a better term from the Pentax than from the Canon. This approach may not translate as well to the computer screen, but it does seem to have an advantage on paper.


William Robb


Thanks, looking at people's photos I've seriously been wondering about that. It occurred to me that Pentax was going for an "analog look."

Marnie aka Doe :-)



-- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com

"You might as well accept people as they are,
you are not going to be able to change them anyway."




Reply via email to