I recommend doing it as TV says, charge a service fee for you work, "I charge $1000 (or whatever) to shoot a wedding which covers my time, equipment, my assistant, film, processing, and proofs". Then let them do what they want with the negatives, one of the the options being for you to get professional prints made for them for a modest fee, "I will supervise the lab and check their prints for quality and make them redo any that are not up to my standards for 15% of their cost of the print order".

If you are a very artistic type and figure your printing and selection is important too, you can simply charge a package price. "I will shoot your wedding produce an album similar to my samples with X number of prints for $2000."

Those ways of working seem to be the only viable options in today's world. Note the both are basically a flat fee job. The days of shooting for little or nothing then making your money on the prints are pretty much gone, if they ever existed. I never met anyone making a living doing it that way although I have met many trying to do so. It seems to work only for guys writing books on how to make money shooting weddings (grin).

Remember no matter what you do for a living, if your customers (or employer) are not willing to pay your wage, plus costs, you can not make a living working for them. That is a simple fact of life.

--

Cotty wrote:

On 24/12/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:


The
numbskull
(deleted much stronger verbiage) bride took the 5x5 proofs
to some jiffy
print outfit and scanned them then got enlargements made
from the scans to
save a few dollars.

I feel your pain.


I used to think b+g's were just cheap, but I think in general they
just don't know any better. I have found that if you explain to people
that a) this sort of thing results in crappy prints, b) it's a federal
offense, and c) this is how you make a living, and you make sure they
sign a contract that states the above, then you'll have fewer
problems.

Now, how did you find out she made copy prints? You can still read her
the riot act.

The last issue is that it sounds like this was done for free, more or
less. This may or may not say something about how she values
photography. Some people don't...it sounds like you value your work
and effort more than she does. The way to avoid this sort of client is
higher prices, or at least an *explicit* understanding of what your
value is. I still do the occasional cheap gig for friends, but these
days I make sure they understand what they're getting, what sort of
work is involved on my end, what's expected of them, etc.


Also, I would imagine it helps a tiny bit to ensure there's plenty of
text across everything but the faces like 'SAMPLE' or 'PROOF' - in fact
also lots of small text as a few large letters are pretty easy to dispose
of in Photoshop....

.02




Cheers, Cotty


___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| www.macads.co.uk/snaps _____________________________ Free UK Mac Ads www.macads.co.uk



-- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com

"You might as well accept people as they are,
you are not going to be able to change them anyway."




Reply via email to