Hi!
It just occurred to me that the reasonable way to produce *original*
wedding photo stuff could probably be shooting on weddings of your
friends/relatives/fellow photogs. But such thing would have to be
agreed upon in advance.
Normally, as I remember myself getting married <g>, I wanted my
wedding photographer to document in a sense what was going to happen.
He did a very good job I think. I suppose it would be a good time to
take yet another look on my wedding album <g>.
Another thought that happens to me <g>. Original stuff can be shot, I
think, not during the ceremony itself. For instance, we were getting
married in January and such thing as an outdoors photo session on the
wedding day in case of winter Jerusalem was impossible...
Well, I only got married once and shot on the wedding just two days
ago... <g>
Boris
- Re: wedding photography...ugh! Tanya Mayer Photography
- RE: wedding photography...ugh! Amita Guha
- Re: wedding photography...ugh! Tanya Mayer Photography
- Re: wedding photography...ugh! Tanya Mayer Photography
- Re: wedding photography...ugh! Bob W
- Re: wedding photography...ugh! Mark Roberts
- Re: wedding photography...ugh! William Robb
- Re: wedding photography...ugh! Doug Brewer
- Re: wedding photography...ugh! Tanya Mayer Photography
- Re: wedding photography...ugh! Boris Liberman
- Re: wedding photography...ugh! Mark Roberts
- Re: wedding photography...ugh! Bob W
- Re: wedding photography...ugh! Mark Roberts
- Re: wedding photography...ugh! graywolf
- RE: wedding photography...ugh! J. C. O'Connell
- RE: wedding photography...ugh! Malcolm Smith
- Re: wedding photography...ugh! graywolf
- Re: wedding photography...ugh! Tanya Mayer Photography
- Re: wedding photography...ugh! Leonard Paris
- Re: wedding photography...ugh! Mark Roberts