Hi list, ... t> Just out of curiousity...do any of these looked dovtored to you?
What do you think about the 747 passing the moon? I think with a focal lenght of about 1600mm equiv., one of the two should be out of focus...depth of field is very flat...or is it already hyperfocal at 35.000 feet? ;-) Thomas Bruce Dayton schrieb: > > Hello tom, > > Yes, some of them do. I have become more skeptical of amazing > technical shots because it can be so easy to alter and combine images. > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce > > Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 9:46:32 AM, you wrote: > > t> Just out of curiousity...do any of these looked dovtored to you? > > t> My mom had sent me this link and I sort of dismissed it. She sends me a lot > t> of doctored crap. > > t> tv > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Rob Brigham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 12:07 PM > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Subject: RE: Best pix of 2003 > >> > >> Ya don't say! > >> > >> I almost sent a sarcastic reply to your comment aimed at > >> Sylwester, but when two similar comments came in together I > >> figured 'give the guy a break - he is obviously having a bad day!' > >> > >> I actually quite like many of the shots in Doug's link though... > >> > >> Then again I am more into "nice" pics than reportage/docupics > >> so I guess I would, wouldn't I? > >> > >> Hope things get better as the day progresses... > >> > >> If not, follow Cotty's advice - "HAVE A DRINK! HAVE A DRINK! > >> HAVE A DRINK! HAVE A DRINK!" - maybe things will improve then! > >> > >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > Sent: 28 January 2004 17:01 > >> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > Subject: Re: Best pix of 2003 > >> > > >> > > >> > Well, maybe "pap" was too strong a word. I'm real cranky this > >> > morning. > >> > > >> > Paul Stenquist wrote: > >> > > >> > > but I don't think that any of these are "pap." > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >>
