--
frank theriault wrote:
So, pursuant to one of Boris' suggestions, I've cropped it:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2154916
Anyone have any thoughts on it? Better, worse, pretty much the same?
Maybe it's me, but with less white in the photo, I don't think his face looks as washed out, but maybe that's just me.
thanks, frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: PAW #1 - Snow Pup Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 20:10:51 +0200
Hi!
ft> Since it's called PAW (I know Bill beat me to it), it had to be an animal
ft> with paws, right?
ft> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2148154
ft> cheers, ft> frank
Drums please <g>...
Frank, sorry, but this one does not work for me. My eyes do not arrive to the puppy. They wonder about the geometry of shades and poses of these two people. The contrast is high which kind of blinds me if you will.
I don't know about the circumstances at which this shot has been taken. But I think if I could I would look for tighter framing. The weather was cold enough so that less of the surroundings would appear just as cold...
Do I make any sense?
Boris
_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/photos&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca
-- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com
"You might as well accept people as they are, you are not going to be able to change them anyway."
