Here's the original, uncropped, full frame one:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2148154
The cropped one is below, in your initial post, which I've left in.
In fact, that's what I did first time I posted the cropped one: I left the url for the uncropped one lower down in the post, hoping that folks would notice, but I know realize that I should have specified what I was doing. I should, after all this time, realize that what's going through my mind is rarely discernable to the general public. <vbg>
cheers, frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PAW #1 - Snow Pup Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 00:18:43 EST
>In a message dated 2/22/2004 8:47:11 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2154916
>Anyone have any thoughts on it? Better, worse, pretty much the same?
>Maybe it's me, but with less white in the photo, I don't think his face looks as washed out, but maybe that's just me.
>thanks, frank
Frank, it would be easier for me to tell if you'd also throw up the url for the uncropped one, so I can compare them. By now I no longer remember. :-)
Doe aka Marnie Been a lot of PAWs, after all.
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcomm&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca
