For me, constant 2.8 is important. I find that many receptions are quite dim, and focusing is a bit tougher. Also, the DSLR 1.5 factor does alter things a bit. A constant aperture 2.8 24-90 would be nice.
Bruce Tuesday, February 24, 2004, 6:39:03 PM, you wrote: MR> "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> What mystifies me about zooms is that there is no 35 to 100 or 120 >>> to be had. That would, seemingly, be a wedding pro's dream zoom. >> >>Seems to me a 28-105 covers that range quite nicely. MR> Nikon's 24-120 is reportedly a big seller (and very popular with the MR> wedding shooters). There are a couple of options in the 24-135 range, MR> too (Sigma, Tamron). MR> And the Pentax 24-90 is in the ballpark, too :)
