I am using a Tamron 28-75/2.8 now. For DSLR 1.5 crop factor, the 24 would be nicer.
We were talking about a lens for wedding photography, not a consumer zoom. -- Best regards, Bruce Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 2:33:23 AM, you wrote: KK> On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Bruce Dayton wrote: >> does alter things a bit. A constant aperture 2.8 24-90 would be nice. KK> I assume that this has to be longer and heavier (and more expensive) KK> than the 28-70/2.8. Are you sure it would be nice? :-))) KK> Kostas
