Re: Zooms, was Re: 24-50s

[Kostas Kavoussanakis]

On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Bruce Dayton wrote:

> does alter things a bit.  A constant aperture 2.8 24-90 would be nice.

I assume that this has to be longer and heavier (and more expensive)
than the 28-70/2.8. Are you sure it would be nice? :-)))

Kostas