Hi,
My girlfriend has a Canon Elph and it mentions in the instruction manual
that a slide film is available.
Cya
>From: James Apilado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Film rewind with memory (WAS: Photo Expo Japan 2001 - MZ-S and
>FA31Ltd)
>Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2001 18:10:57 -0700
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from [216.32.91.72] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
>MHotMailBC9A58C800A240043255D8205B48AA1E0; Sun Apr 08 18:18:02 2001
>Received: (from majordomo@localhost)by noc002.aitg.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id
>VAA05690for pentax-discuss-pdml-list; Sun, 8 Apr 2001 21:11:36 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from smtp04.mail.onemain.com (SMTP-OUT003.ONEMAIN.COM
>[63.208.208.73])by noc002.aitg.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id VAA05686for
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 8 Apr 2001 21:11:30 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: (qmail 24878 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2001 01:10:56 -0000
>Received: from 209-239-223-131.pdx.jps.net (HELO ?209.239.223.131?)
>([209.239.223.131]) (envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) by
>smtp04.mail.onemain.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 9 Apr 2001 01:10:56 -0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 08 18:19:50 2001
>User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Precedence: list
>
>Hi Ken.
>When I started on this list back in '96 when APS was staring out, I took a
>lot of flack from die hard 35mm fans who seemed threatened by the new
>format. My only complaint with APS is that you can't buy slide film here
>in
>the U.S. I recall when 110 came out in the early 70's, slide film could be
>purchased. Even the earlier 126 format had slide film available.
>Jim A.
>
> > From: "K.Takeshita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2001 19:32:51 -0400
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Film rewind with memory (WAS: Photo Expo Japan 2001 - MZ-S
>and
> > FA31Ltd)
> >
> > on 4/8/01 6:51 PM, James Apilado at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> Then again, Pentax could have made an APS camera and you wouldn't have
>to go
> >> through all this hassle to get to an unexposed frame.
> >
> > Hi Jim and all,
> >
> > I am known to fond of APS (OK, duck & hide ! :-). I know arguments
>about
> > smaller neg size and all that. But I do appreciate the engineering put
>into
> > designing the APS film cassette. It is amazing what this little
>cassette
> > does. It eliminates all clumsy things photographers have to put up with
> > (unproductive part of taking photos :-) and the MRC is excellent. Just
>the
> > idea to make the film system into a cassette is what I like.
> >
> > I only wished that they made a 35mm APS system. It would be even
>marvelous
> > if the design concept is accommodated into the MedF system somehow.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Ken
> >
> > -
> > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
> >
> >
>
>-
>This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
>go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
>visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
