the 14/n is 13Mpixel, none of the APS are even close to that so the 3K difference is more than just FF, its much higher image quality too.
JCO -----Original Message----- From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 8:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 35mm coverage of new lenses Antonio wrote on 12.08.04 14:13: > Plus, you have to look at the price of lenses for APS sensors v the > price of FF lenses. APS doesnt look so cheap when you can pick up nice > K mount lenses on ebay for a steal. Not to mention all the existing > Pentax K-mount owners who will find a very easy upgrade path to > ditital with FF. Right, as long as price difference between FF and APS sensor cameras is lower than price of wide angle lens(es) dedicated for smaller CCD. So far price difference between the cheapest FF camera (Kodak 14/N) and based on the same analog body (F80) APS CCD camera is roughly 3000$. So you can buy for about 1000USD Nikon DX 12-24/4 dedicated for smaller sensor lens (18-36 mm equiv) and still have 2000USD left for other lenses :-) -- Best Regards Sylwek
