Hi,
I'd also like to suggest that if possible we should write a few words
with the submission about the LX that took the picture, or our own
experience of however many of them we own(ed).
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday, April 27, 2001, 6:30:53 PM, you wrote:
> Hi John ...
> It's just a fun thing for LX shooters to participate in. It's not a
> big deal, and it's not some sort of snobbery or exclusive club.
> It's just a bunch of
> LX users deciding to make some photographs with their cameras and
> post them somewhere. It's a small way for LX users to do
> ~something~ to celebrate their joy and satisfaction of using the
> camera, and, perhaps, express our sadness or disappointment that the
> camera has passed out of production.
> I plan to use as many accessories that are unique to the LX as
> possible for my submission: The FB-1 system, winder, remote winder
> cord, special viewing screen, and so forth.
> John Francis wrote:
>> Using any particular body has far less effect. If the LX images
>> are captured using the unique features of that body (OTF metering?)
>> that's one thing. But an image that is indistinguishable from one
>> captured with a Spotmatic, MX, PZ-1p, or (heresy!) a Canon or Nikon
>> (or Leica) - how does that serve as a testament to the LX?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
