They're not stupid. They'll continue to support those products and
functions that matter. The aperture cam doesn't make a hoot of a
difference. The *istD works fine without it. But you don't know that.
You haven't tried it.
On Sep 18, 2004, at 8:14 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
If they abandoned K/M aperture setting for no good reason what exactly
make you think they wont abandon other product's & features shortly ,
later
products, products you now own or might buy? Why trust them after this?
It's a total "about-face" in policy from their entire previous
history....
JCO
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 8:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: istDs - what a great camera!
On Sep 18, 2004, at 7:31 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
You guys don't seem to understand the implication of abandoning
support of K/M lenses with no technical ( and no one has yet proven it
was a cost issue either) reason to do so. They have crossed the line
and can longer be trusted to support anything you buy for any time as
they may decide whatever they want to do on anything.
That's completely irrelevant if you're the only person who feels that
way. And it appears that you're quite alone on this one.
