It must suck to be so angry about cameras.
Paul
On Sep 24, 2004, at 12:06 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Incredible comments. Hehe. Stopped all the way down to F1.4 huh?
I clearly posted earlier that the loss of metering sensitivity with stop down metering vs. open aperture metering is directly proportional to the number of stops you stop down. You stopped down ZERO stops so your metering sensitivity wasn't affected at all, exactly the same as open aperure actually in terms of sensitivity....
The sensitivity disadvantage of stop down metering only occurs if you actually stop down! Wide open aperure setting is not stopped down one bit.
JCO
-----Original Message----- From: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 11:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: A random snapshot
It brings up a logical question but I won't ask it.
William Robb wrote:
This one was taken last night. The resteraunt we had supper at is a few
doors down from the local adult toy store, and this caught my eye for some reason. Technically, this shot should not have worked, judging from recent discussion. It was shot well afer dark with a K series lens (50mm f/1.4) using the stop down metering method. Handheld, wide open, I think for 1/100 second, sensitivity set to 400.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/paw/lovebike.jpg
William Robb
-- I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime. --P.J. O'Rourke
