Yes, It's one of the new sculptures in Millenium Park. The visual impact is stunning in contrast to the right angles in the buildings. Bob
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 08:20:25 -0500, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cool. What is that. I didn't see it. Is it in Millennium Park? I only > had four or five hours of free time, so I did about two hours on North > Michigan Avenue and another two hours in Andersonville. > Paul > > > On Nov 14, 2004, at 2:08 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote: > > > Paul, > > Better photos of the Chicago ship. > > http://members.aol.com/rfsindg/ship1.jpg > > http://members.aol.com/rfsindg/ship2.jpg > > Regards, Bob S. > > > > On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 01:06:27 -0600, Bob Sullivan > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Paul, > >> Did you get to see the ship? > >> http://members.aol.com/rfsindg/ship3.jpg > >> Regards, Bob S. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 07:59:20 -0500, Paul Stenquist > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Here's another shot from my Chicago walkaround of a couple of weeks > >>> ago. After the Wrigley building, it's probably the most > >>> over-photographed structure in Chicago. I tried to get a fresh > >>> perspective by juxtaposing it against another structure. My main > >>> subject is in shade, the backdrop in full sun. Shot with the *istD > >>> and > >>> the DA 16-45 at 18mm, f8, ISO 200, 1/250. (Don't you just love > >>> metadata?:-) It's here: > >>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2849112 > >>> > >>> > >> > > > >
