Digital is not a religon, just away to cut corners, while getting nice pics!
Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 6. januar 2005 05:13 Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Emne: Re: More Enablement was[Re: Enablement A Go-Go!!] On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:50:50 -0500, Jeff Tokayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We're talking about the Digital religion. ;-) That explains it. The notion that digital capture and reproduction of images is superior to film is nothing more than a belief system unsupported by empirical evidence. That fits most definitions of religion that I know of. All you need is a diety (although I've heard of some silly people calling atheism a religion - which it clearly isn't - and they don't have a diety, do they?). cheers, frank ps: I'm joking, so please, no frantic posts telling me how inferior film is to digital and how digital is killing film and how film is dying. I know all that stuff. I was merely making a funny.. -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
