The 20D is only 8 megapixels. That's an almost insignificant difference. And the viewfinder is crappy. I would hope that the next APS Pentax is a considerable step up from the 20D. In fact, as K Takehita (sp?) mentioned in this thread, the *ist D is in many ways a better choice than the 20D.
> I agree, seems to me that a 20D competitor is more important to the > health of Pentax than a 645D. > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce > > > Tuesday, March 29, 2005, 5:23:41 PM, you wrote: > > HC> in what sense should you be happy? waiting until most of the others try it > HC> first works only when you are very large and can move at your leisure, > HC> waiting until the others make mistakes. when a market is growing as fast > as > HC> the DSLR market is and is going to stop growing in perhaps 2 years, it's > HC> very dangerous to not stay even. > > HC> Herb.... > HC> ----- Original Message ----- > HC> From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > HC> To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net> > HC> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 12:51 PM > HC> Subject: Re: Future of DA lenses > > > >> Possibly we can be happy for that? I was somewhat disappointed that the > >> *ist DS was a downward direction as opposed to upward in some features > >> (not knocking it). > > > >
