This is funny -- I never got paul's first post - The 72 polarizer I'm selling, btw is NOT a circular one... I'll take either in the 58 (if, as in a film camera, the circular works on all o 'em.)
ann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Thanks for the correction. > > > That's not correct: the Canon Pro-1 does not require a circular > > polarizer. It has no beam splitters or reflecting mirrors in the > > light path to any sensor. > > > > Godfrey > > > > On May 20, 2005, at 11:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Don't forget that you're going to need a circular polarizer for > > > that Canon digital. > > > Paul > > > > > > > > > > > >> Tiffen. also 72mm pentax lens cap (was that for > > >> my 400 or 300? I forget) > > >> > > >> Will sell outright or barter for a 58mm polarizer > > >> > > >> Make me an offer I can't refuse - > > >> > > >> WOuld love not to have to buy a 58mm polarizer > > >> > > >> Hey look it really is FRiday! > > >> > > >> annsan > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >
