This isnt a contiunation of any goading battle ( I wasn't aware there was a goading battle?, I stick to the subject matter). But there is a difference between being "unpersuadable" and actually having made a correct unarguable contention in the first place...
If say 10 arguments are throw at me to suggest why I am wrong about anything I contend and I successfully logically argue why ALL of those arguments are either false or irrelevant to that contention of mine, then the result is my contention was unarguably correct, not that I'm just "unpersuadeable". BIG DIFFERENCE. jco -----Original Message----- From: Adam Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 10:49 AM To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: Rename request Well, I'd consider that JCO started the goading, but that's debatable. That said, I'm letting this argument rest, JCO is unpersuasible and it's not worth arguing about. We've both wasted too much time on it as it is. -Adam P. J. Alling wrote: > Maybe. OTOH has anyone counted how many times his major opponent > (Adam) > has goaded him on? > > John Celio wrote: > >>> JCO is one of the old timers here. >> >> >> >> So that gives him the right to drive the rest of us bonkers? >> >> John Celio >> >> -- >> >> http://www.neovenator.com >> >> AIM: Neopifex >> >> "Hey, I'm an artist. I can do whatever I want and pretend I'm making >> a statement." >> > >
