Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Sep 25, 2005, at 9:14 AM, mike wilson wrote:
There comes a point in resolution when scanning film that all
you're doing is resolving more emulsion defects too. At 2820ppi, I
can see the grain clearly in ASA 100 film. Most of the benefit
from 3000 ppi upwards is in grain imaging, rather than actual
picture quality.
There's a contradiction in that last sentence.
How so? Please explain.
I'm interested in seeing the photograph, not the grain.
Godfrey
Last time I checked, the photograph is built by small bits of grain.
No photograph without grain. Better grain quality equals better
photograph quality.
/Henri
