The 645 is 35mm sized by Canon standards.
Tom C wrote:
That's what I'm hoping for in the future, FF 12+ MP. I would have
little desire to carry a 645D around with me when other makers would
offer essentialy the same in a 35mm size body.
Tom C.
From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: "pentax list" <pentax-discuss@pdml.net>
Subject: Re: Pentax Future? What's next for Pentax...
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 08:29:56 +0100
On 29/9/05, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I guess that sort of sums my feelings. I agree with Paul that I
haven't
>found 6 MP inadequate, but then what have I to compare it to?
Suppose we
>took a photo and wanted to crop it by some factor for display or
printing.
>Assuredly a 12, 16 etc., megapixel camera will allow this to be done
with a
>higher degree of (dare I say resolution) quality, than a 10MP
camera, or
>than a 6MP camera.
Excuse me for being a complete dolt here. But can someone tell me what
the point of an APS-C sensor DSLR at 16 or even 12 MP is? Sincerely, I
fail to see it.
If they're going to cram 16 MP onto a chip that size, why not just
make a
24x36mm sensor?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com
_____________________________
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
