Ahh, yes - that was a specific reference to Java and assorted other such plug-ins.
Thanks for clarifying that. Shel > [Original Message] > From: mike wilson > Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > > Who said it was junk? Who said it is inappropriate to offer it as a PESO? > > If you're implying that I said that, or that anyone here said that, the > > implication is dead wrong, and I am somewhat miffed at the idea that you > > think I said or implied any such thing. In fact, quite the contrary - I > > said it was good work. > > > > Shel > > Someone has miisread this, where you were (I think) talking about java: > ========================================================================== > > I clicked on all the buttons, and couldn't get it to stop, only reverse > > direction. Maybe my Java's not up to date. I don't care - I'm not > > downloading any more junk like that to my computer. Anyway, this isn't a > > corporate computer ... > =========================================================================== > > > > > > > > > >>[Original Message] > >>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net> > >>Date: 1/31/2006 11:46:28 AM > >>Subject: RE: PESO: (Panorama Ever So Often) > >> > >>I understand Shel's unhappiness here, but I found Jens' panorama quite > > > > interesting and well done. And I believe it's perfectly appropriate to > > offer it as a PESO. Those who wish to view it will do so. Those who would > > prefer not to look at it. won't. But I think it's wrong to dismiss it as > > "junk." It's not junk.
