The article focused primarily on point and shoot. No biggy.
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> That's probably because Pentax just wants to keep it a big secret.
>
>
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: Perry Pellechia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> >To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> >Subject: OT: NYT article on Digital Cameras (PMA)
> >Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:50:31 -0500
> >
> >Pixel Counting Joins Film in Obsolete Bin
> >
> >Published: February 2, 2006
> >
> >IF you work in the camera industry, February is an exciting month.
> >That's when you head down to Florida for the annual Photo Marketing
> >Association convention, where your company will unveil its latest
> >camera models, thus making the ones everybody got for Christmas
> >obsolete. But this February is more exciting than most. Big changes
> >are in the photographic air.
> >
> >http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/02/technology/circuits/02pogue.html?_r=1&oref=lo
> gin
> >
> >Almost every manufacturer is mentioned.... except Pentax :-(
> >
> >
> ><---------------------------------------------------->
> >Perry Pellechia
> >
> >Primary email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Alternate email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Home Page: http://homer.chem.sc.edu/perry
> ><---------------------------------------------------->
> >
>
>
