There doing a great job then. On 2/2/06, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's probably because Pentax just wants to keep it a big secret. > > > > Tom C. > > > > > > > >From: Perry Pellechia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > >To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > >Subject: OT: NYT article on Digital Cameras (PMA) > >Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:50:31 -0500 > > > >Pixel Counting Joins Film in Obsolete Bin > > > >Published: February 2, 2006 > > > >IF you work in the camera industry, February is an exciting month. > >That's when you head down to Florida for the annual Photo Marketing > >Association convention, where your company will unveil its latest > >camera models, thus making the ones everybody got for Christmas > >obsolete. But this February is more exciting than most. Big changes > >are in the photographic air. > > > >http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/02/technology/circuits/02pogue.html?_r=1&oref=login > > > >Almost every manufacturer is mentioned.... except Pentax :-( > > > > > ><----------------------------------------------------> > >Perry Pellechia > > > >Primary email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Alternate email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Home Page: http://homer.chem.sc.edu/perry > ><----------------------------------------------------> > > > > >
-- <----------------------------------------------------> Perry Pellechia Primary email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alternate email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page: http://homer.chem.sc.edu/perry <---------------------------------------------------->
