What are you talking about? A normal negative measures 55mm by 70mm! This 24mm by 36mm stuff goes in toy cameras.
When is The Brotherhood getting their 67D, anyways? I'm tired of these eensie weensie thingamabobs. I have a DS2 and I damn near swallowed it the other day because I mistook it for a chocolate truffle. And the 67D better damned well be full frame! And what's with this 645D nonsense? That thing is a woman's camera. -Aaron p.s. come on, you knew "he" would be back one day. -----Original Message----- From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subj: RE: Some more new camera speculation Date: Wed Mar 1, 2006 5:01 pm Size: 2K To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net> Nope, I was just supporting Rob, who obviously wants a larger sensor than just 15x24mm. It's less than half of a "normal" negative. So do I, BTW. I want it to be big enough to be adequate for actually "makeable" lenses. Small enough to give me great DOF. The small sensors do - as the resoultion is increasing, require more and more of the lenses ability to resolve. This means HUGE expenses on lenses. Who wnats that? That's a fair statement, I believe. I would very much like to have a FF sensor, but it seems they are not (yet) quite good enough (soft corners?) Who the h... says that a 15x24mm sensor is the "ultimate answer" to the sensor size? Perhaps it's not 24x36mm either. Perhaps it's actaully 20x29mm! Canon seems to think so. Why not listen to the expeters - they probably sell more DSLR's than anyone else? Canon is currently setting the DSLR standards - whether you like it or not. I don't really want to switch to Canon. The problem is - I may have to, if Pentax can't deliver a "state of the art" DSLR sometime soon: 5-8 FPS, as well as correspondingly fast AF and write speed. Pentax seem to be way behind as far as speed goes. Come on, Pentax - try to catch up, will you, pleasw? Before the very last "pentaxians" are leaving too - except of course, for a handful of true "believers" from the Spotmatic and LX generation! LX was twenty years ago, right! Tell me to shoot action using maunal focus! Heck - I can do that with one of my Exakta VX1000 - from the sixties! Or a K1000! Regards Jens x24mmo, I believe i Jens Bladt http://www.jensbladt.dk -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 1. marts 2006 19:01 Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Emne: Re: Some more new camera speculation ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jens Bladt" Subject: RE: Some more new camera speculation > Nop, but appr. 5mm more in each direction! > That ought to count for something - 60% more, actually. It doesn't count as full frame, which I believe is what you were implying in a previous post. I could be wrong about your intent though. William Robb -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.1/271 - Release Date: 02/28/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.1/271 - Release Date: 02/28/2006