His statement says that it is a "pretty good definition of reality",
which is not science. It is therefore not included in the definition.
Ipso facto, Graywolf was not talking about science.
Godfrey
On Mar 29, 2006, at 10:54 AM, John Forbes wrote:
That may or may not be so. But I believe Graywolf was talking
about science.
And to me, too, the phrase "physical and natural world" sounds like
another way of describing reality. Anything else, like music, is
in our heads.
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 19:18:58 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If that is your considered opinion, you are not well-educated in
the study of Philosophy.
On Mar 29, 2006, at 10:15 AM, graywolf wrote:
"The systematic study of the structure and behavior of the
physical and natural world through observation and experiment"
Sounds like a pretty good defination of reality to me.
