On 4/28/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The keeping quality of inkjet prints depends upon both the ink type > and the mating of paper and ink, as well as the archival qualities of > the paper itself. I'm not sure what you mean by reticulation ... What > I see in my older dye-based inkjet prints that have faded is > oxidation of the dyes, due to the dye as well as the fact that it > didn't mate well with the paper.
Reticulation, like on film, the surface looks like a cracked & dried lake bed. I've seen it on some of my old inkjet prints too. Dave S > On Apr 27, 2006, at 4:37 PM, graywolf wrote: > > > I make prints of selected images. I guess I feel those are the ones > > worth keeping. Physical copies of everything would just be too > > expensive. BTW, unlike others I am not too enthused with the > > keeping quality of ink jet prints, especially since I noticed some > > reticulation in some not so old prints. > >
