Jens Bladt wrote: > I re-did the FA 1.4/50mm test shot. Put more effort in to focusing. This > time I took off the UV-filter. > Looks a little better: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/177097232/ > > I do, however, find the M 1.7/50mm to be a tiny bit sharper. If it's at all > possible to actually see any difference. If not the whole matter is kinda > pointless, isn't it.
The M version 50mm/1.7 is known to be a very sharp performer. Has a reputation for excellent resolution. Sort of an unknown lens except aficionados... What they call a "sleeper." keith whaley > I think I'd choose the M-lens for close up work, though. I often did. > > I use the FA for portraits, because it has the AF option Like this: > http://www.jensbladt.dk/Nykoege/Pasfotomappe/John-Kellberg-1682-has.jpg. > Shot at F 22, wich is NOT the best choise I've made. > > Regards > > Jens Bladt -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
