I'm stating that Pentax having released, what, 4 different 6MP DLSR's in the last 3 years, why release another (2, one with Anti-shake and one w/o)? It seems like they are repeating the P&S approach they were abandoning and positioning themselves at the bottom of the market (at least perception-wise).
Who can contend that a higher pixel count is not the way the industry has been moving and that all other things being equal, that MP is the baseline measure of potential image quality? Tom C. "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered." >From: Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >Subject: Re: K110D - Why bother? >Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:55:22 -0400 > > >On Aug 11, 2006, at 11:53 AM, Tom C wrote: > > > What evidence is their out there, however that any of the *latest* > > generation of DSLR's has a serious noise problem? > >Which ones, Tom? And I'm not saying that it's a "serious problem" or >even that it's particularly terrible, just that more megapixels are not >an automatic advantage. Remember, you're the one saying that the >latest Pentax release is a very bad idea. > >-Aaron > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
