Tom, go ahead and compare the price difference on cards of the same speed. -Aaron
-- http://aaronreynolds.ca http://battersbox.ca http://hardballtimes.com -----Original Message----- From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subj: Re: CF v SD Cards Date: Tue 2006 Aug 22 11:56 am Size: 1K To: pdml@pdml.net Faster... noticeably to humans or just to chronometers measuring in nanoseconds? Tom C. "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered." From: Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> Subject: Re: CF v SD Cards Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 06:37:23 -0400 On Aug 22, 2006, at 6:20 AM, Cotty wrote: > Seems to me that SD is becoming the consumer standard. CF is still a > professional standard and I don't see any sign of that changing. I > would > suspect that there are probably good reasons for that. Considering that most "pro" bodies are physically much bigger, there's not as much compelling upside to switch. But if you gave me the option between a larger, slower card and a smaller, faster card for the same money, I'd take the smaller, faster card every time. Why wouldn't you? -Aaron -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
