To me, the finder on the LX is unrivaled. It is not as bright as the others and does not seem to be as sharp on the ground glass, but it offers a much bigger view of things. You really have to look through it to see what I mean. I also think that for manual focus work, there is no substitute for a split screen focusing aid.
The ergonomics on the LX are also great. To be honest, all three have great ergonomics, though they are completely different in their layouts.
Of the three, the LX is the most limited with relatively slow flash synch (1/75th of a second) and no spot metering. But once you pick it up and try it, you'll love it.
- MCC
At 11:27 AM 8/27/01 -0700, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I'm curious. At least Pål, and maybe others have both LX and MZ-S. We have
compared quite often the PZ-1p and MZ-S, but not really the LX vs. MZ-S.
Other than low light metering, is there anything else about the LX that
would have you keep both bodies? Anybody with experience?
- - - - - - - - - -
Mark Cassino
Kalamazoo, MI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- - - - - - - - - -
Photos:
- - - - - - - - - -
