You guys are starting to worry me!
I just bought my first LX and have put only a few rolls through it so far.
How much life can I expect from this camera? Let's put it this way: I don't
intend to replace it! And honestly, for my application
(nature/wildlife/landscape), I see no reason to own a brand new camera. I'm
looking at buying full mechanical backups such as an MX but I have no need
for program modes or autofocus.
Christian Skofteland
System Administrator
ServerVault Inc.
"Securing the Internet"
(703)373-5971 (Direct)
(703)333-5900 (Main)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-----Original Message-----
From: Pål Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 7:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MZ-S vs. LX
Shel wrote:
> Apart from that, I believe the newer models have somewhat better
> insulated and more durable electronic connections, and the finish on
> the newer bodies is different than that on the older bodies. It's
> more matte-like, which I prefer, while possibly being more durable
> (just guessing on that one).
The newer finish is morer resistant to scratches but more prone to brassing
due to wear.
Pål
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
