If it's a good way to learn how can it be unproductive at the same time? Only if one is a nihilist :-). Paul On Sep 8, 2006, at 5:27 PM, Tom C wrote:
>> >> > Favor/Disfavor how? The Pentax representative should only care >> > about one >> > thing - Sell as much Pentax gear as possible. If stock is withheld >> > or price >> > breaks are not given to the retailer, the only thing the Pentax rep >> > would be >> > doing is cutting his own/Pentax's throat. >> >> I'm sure you can imagine how a rep who has a dealer that is pissing >> him/her off can favor that dealer's competitors with product >> shipments, allocations, etc. Don't be naïve. >> > > I'm sure it can happen but it's stupid, and in a sense spiting > oneself to punish another. > >> > I agree that the speculation is more or less an unproductive use of >> > time >> > when the details will be known eventually... but then this is the >> > PDML. :-) >> >> So you're saying that the PDML is generally speaking an unproductive >> use of time. >> > > Sure. Generally speaking it is unproductive. But it doesn't mean > it's not a fun diversion, a good way to learn, or a useful > resource when a specific piece of information is requested. > > Tom C. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
