And started off by saying that you assumed Pentax would make several lower-spec versions and that that was a bad thing.
-Adam Tom C wrote: > Are you sure you thought out what you just wrote? > > I haven't expressed anything negative about the K10D (except my wish to > still be able to use off-the-shelf batteries). To the contrary I expressed > that the camera was desirable and that I hope Pentax continues down this > path. > > Tom C. > > > > > > > > > >>From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >>Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D >>Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:20:53 -0400 >> >>Tom, >> >>You've got a funny way of being honest. Always looking at the bad side >>first is negativity, not honesty. >> >>-Adam >> >> >> >>Tom C wrote: >> >>>It's typical of many in this group to perceive honesty as negativity and >>>criticism. Pentax is not my religion. You have expressed exactly my >>>sentiments. >>> >>> >>> >>>Tom C. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >>>>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >>>>Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D >>>>Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 05:57:04 -0700 (PDT) >>>> >>>>The K10D may be all I'll ever 'need', but, like Tom, I'd still like to >>>>see Pentax continue to build on this upgrade and the new level of >>>>respect it will likely realize. >>>> >>>>Jack >>>> >>>>--- John Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Nor can Tom. Pentax have just produced the most exciting camera for >>>>>years >>>>>(from any manufacturer), and Tom is struggling to find something >>>>>negative >>>>>to say. >>>>> >>>>>But he'll be back on form soon enough, I'm sure. >>>>> >>>>>And in due course he'll buy one, and then won't stop telling people >>>>>how >>>>>good Pentax cameras are, and how he always liked them, and never lost >>>>> >>>>>faith, blah, blah, blah. >>>>> >>>>>It was ever thus. >>>>> >>>>>John >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 06:55:55 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi >>>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Tom C wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>Now, if they can just avoid downgrading it more than twice and >>>>>>>concentrate >>>>>>>on being forward looking... >>>>>> >>>>>>I can't figure out what you mean. >>>>>> >>>>>>Godfrey >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>-- >>>>>Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>-- >>>>>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>PDML@pdml.net >>>>>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>__________________________________________________ >>>>Do You Yahoo!? >>>>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >>>>http://mail.yahoo.com >>>> >>>>-- >>>>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>PDML@pdml.net >>>>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>PDML@pdml.net >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
