In other words, you're capable of judging the issues independent of blind allegiance to a political party or cause. You're not influenced by what happens to be politically correct at the moment. That's a good place to be. Paul On Sep 26, 2006, at 9:26 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
> Paul Crovella wrote: >> Adam Maas wrote: >>> I'm hardly a Republican (hell, I'm not even American). >> >> Well I'll tell ya, you'd fit right in! >> > > Hmm > > I'm socially liberal, support socialized medicine and education, vote > for the NDP on a regular basis (Canada's socialist party), opposed the > (so-called) War on Drugs (up to and including supporting > legalization of > hard drugs), think peacekeeping is a good idea, support strong > environmental regulation, am seriously in favour of (relatively) free > immigration et al. > > On the other hand, I think the 2nd Ammendment guarantees the First > (And > wish we had that guarantee here in Canada), am something of a hawk on > National Defence and a skeptic on some Global Warming issues (The > human > contribution to it and the actual results of it, not whether or not > it's > occuring), but the latter is mostly due to historical data (It was > notably warmer on earth 1000 years ago). Oh, and with a couple > exceptions (notably healthcare and education), I generally think that > government solutions cause more problems than they solve, but that's > more a case of inherent bureaucratic empire building tahn anything > else. > > In other words, I'm a Tory/NDP swing voter, depending on the issues at > hand. By US standards that would make me a moderate democrat, who > might > swing republican depending on the issues. > > -Adam > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
