I don't think Bob was angry. He was just rude. We all agree with Dvorak. But it isn't worth repeating. If a columnist can't think of something more interesting and unique than this old saw, he shouldn't write at all. On Oct 1, 2006, at 7:12 PM, Christian wrote:
> Paul Stenquist wrote: >> I guess it's just that Dvorak is stating the obvious. A photograph >> isn't reality. It's just a photograph, subject to the whims of the >> person who takes it and the person who processes it. We already knew >> that. > > > Well, duh. But how is that "shallow"? And why is Bob so angry > about a > stupid PC magazine column? It would seem that Bob does not agree with > the content possibly even though you and I see it as "stating the > obvious." > > I guess I'm just trying to understand the slew of negativity towards a > column that, while obvious, I do agree with. > > -- > > Christian > http://photography.skofteland.net > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
