> > Paul Stenquist wrote: > > I guess it's just that Dvorak is stating the obvious. A photograph
> > isn't reality. It's just a photograph, subject to the whims of the > > person who takes it and the person who processes it. We > already knew > > that. > > > Well, duh. But how is that "shallow"? And why is Bob so > angry about a > stupid PC magazine column? It would seem that Bob does not > agree with > the content possibly even though you and I see it as "stating > the obvious." > > I guess I'm just trying to understand the slew of negativity > towards a > column that, while obvious, I do agree with. > Hi, I'm not angry, and I didn't say I disagreed with it. I said it was shallow. When I was a student I was warned to be on guard when people stated that something was obvious. Bob -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
