Certainly there is a great variation in the pattern and pace of shooting for each individual. Post processing being THE big difference, particularly for those who don't do 'dark room'. In my case, when on a photo/sightseeing trip, I don't want editing or PS capability, simply a way of clearing the card to safe storage 'til returning home. Odd, I suppose, but the image processing will be done as a separate event.
Jack --- Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 2, 2006, at 12:17 AM, Jack Davis wrote: > > > Film affords one a quiet period of relaxation and gentle > anticipation > > between the shooting and the viewing. Sorta nice change, huh? > > I'm not sure that this is any different for me. I don't shoot > quickly, and don't do much other than glance at a one second review > flash to see if I'm close with the exposure now and then unless the > lighting situation is very difficult. I shoot about the same number > of frames per session (about 35-100) as I used to with 35mm film > too .. With film, I used to bracket a bit more since I can't check > the overall exposure so easily. That's about the biggest difference. > > And of course, with 1 and 2 Gbyte storage cards, I "change rolls" > much more infrequently, don't have to spend an hour (or money) in > chemical processing. > > I enjoy doing photography in much the same way, regardless of capture > > medium. > > Godfrey > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
