Just because a company doesn't go bankrupt doesn't mean They are making all the right moves... jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Savage Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 9:42 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: RE: The JCO survey At 01:35 AM 10/10/2006, J. C. O'Connell wrote: >They have? Your conclusion is based on what? >jco Lack of full K & M lens support hasn't bankrupted them. Pentax is still in business, and selling decent cameras that people are buying. Dave >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Mark Roberts >Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 1:24 PM >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >Subject: Re: The JCO survey > >Perry Pellechia wrote: > > >The real question is how much would you be willing to pay extra for a > >camera that had the feature. > >No, the real question is how many camera sales might Pentax lose by not >having this feature. > >It's been several years since the aperture simulator disappeared. >They've figured out the answer at this point. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
